1.9 KiB
1.9 KiB
phase, task, total_tasks, status, last_updated
| phase | task | total_tasks | status | last_updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9-real-bond-data | 5 | 6 | paused | 2026-04-03T13:43:26.520Z |
<current_state>
We have successfully implemented the "Real Corporate Bond Data Fetching Pipeline" (Phase 9) using an open-source Naver Finance scraper, substituted fake benchmark mappings with actual realistic ISINs (e.g. KR600538012C Hyundai Motor), and excluded Rate (SOFR/CD91D) from default simulations. We also fixed a fatal bug where empty Equity shock frames crashed the sqlite generation which 500'd the API. We are pausing to consolidate progress.
</current_state>
<completed_work>
- Task 1: Built
bond_data_fetcher.pyand decoupledRateclassification. - Done - Task 2: Adjusted
create_security_master.pyto employ realistic ISINs (Samsung, Hyundai, KB, KTB). - Done - Task 3: Modified
market_risk_engine.pyto execute accurately over mixed asset types. - Done - Task 4: Solved API Internal Server Error caused by sqlite missing dataset. - Done </completed_work>
<remaining_work>
- Task 5: Push documentation to Gitea Wiki (currently blocked by git remote auth, drafted locally instead). </remaining_work>
<decisions_made>
- Decided to use hardcoded real ISINs linked to Naver Finance proxy representations because
pykrxbond endpoints were broken, and generating/scraping raw issuance reports from DART/Seibro needs API Keys and is heavily captcha-gated. </decisions_made>
<next_action> Start with: Reviewing the UI to ensure the user is completely satisfied with the ISIN bond rendering, then proceed to any remaining UI polishing or back-testing tasks. </next_action>